Zgamma to ZZ ratio

Europe/Berlin
DESY

DESY

Description
Vidyo link: https://vidyoportal.cern.ch/join/fJTg4XgY9EHN
    • 11:00 11:50
      News 50m
      Speakers: Beate Heinemann (DESY and Freiburg University), Mr Jorge Andres Sabater Iglesias (ATLAS), Mr Massimiliano Grazzini (University of Zurich), Pieter Everaerts (DESY), Dr Stefan Kallweit (CERN)
      Slides

      Present: Beate, Jorge, Massimiliano, Pieter, Ruchi, Simone, Stefan, Yee

       

      Selection details:
      - 76 GeV <MZℓℓ<106 GeV, pt(ℓ1)> 30 GeV, pt(ℓ2)> 20 GeV, |eta(ℓ)| < 2.5, DeltaR(ℓ,gamma)>0.4, pt(gamma)> 60 GeV, |eta(gamma)| < 2.5

      Dynamic scales:
      sqrt(MZ2+pt(Z->nunu/gamma)2)

       

      Higher order QCD corrections:

      - look at scale variations as well and compare with the k-factor uncertainty
         -> make sure the k-factor uncertainty is larger than the scale variations, otherwise we might want to change our prescriptions
      - change dynamic scale for ZZ to be consistent with Zgamma dynamic scale (Simone already sent instructions)

       

      EWK corrections: 

      - ZZ ready, Zgamma on the scale of a few days
      - DeltaR_{l, photon}<0.1 recombination (compatible with ATLAS), i.e. add photon to lepton. if 0.1<dR(l,gamma)<0.2, reject lepton as photon spoils isolation (can likely be neglected as the same for ZZ and Zgamma)
      - jet-lepton overlap can probably be ignored since it plays a minor role and should impact the ZZ and Zgamma processes in the same way
      - two close photons: maybe check whether there is a difference between using recombination and not (since it is a small amount of phase space)

      Isolation uncertainties: 

      - calculate difference between Frixione and parton-level isolation with MCFM to get an estimate of the uncertainty
         -> but could be a larger effect at NNLO
      - see whether we can tune the epsilon parameter so that parton-level isolation and Frixione isolation behave similarly at NLO and then apply this range to NNLO 
      - epsilon parameter range chosen to cover the difference between parton-level isolation at truth-level and reco-level

       

      PDF uncertainties

      - use NLO MCFM with NNLO PDFs, this should be good enough

       

      Future plans

      - detailed discussion of how to obtain the central value and how to combine the uncertainties