Type B

Section 1
- Line 26: What do the authors mean by "moderate missing transverse momentum"

Section 6
- It should be described how the EW WZ process is evaluated as background for the aQGC and Higgs analyses, particularly for the later where the event selection is different.
- Line 229-231:  Not clear. If I understood correctly one wants to say "... data-driven technique, except for the component of the Zγ process in which the photon experiences conversion into leptons in the tracker (non prompt). In such case, simulation is used.
- Line 234: How is background from simulation constrained by the data? Normalisation? Shape?

Section 7
- The theoretical uncertainties in the model dependent limits should also be discussed

Section  8
- What is the aim to define a looser fiducial region? Should be explained.
- Line 365-366: The claim of an excess of data events can be a bit misleading. Particularly when looking at mu_EW, I would say the background is a bit overestimated.

Section 9
- It should be included in the text that the EW WZ contributes to the background. It only appears in the caption of figure 4.
- Previous limits could be shown for comparison.

Section 10
- Missing a figure with MT distribution containing signal distributions. Fig 4 does not count because the event selection for Higgs search is different.
- Previous limits could be shown for comparison.

Section 11
- Lines 426-428: It is not clear what the authors want to say. 


Type A

Section 1
- Line 33: additional Higgs or other scalar bosons

Section 6
- Line 234: in a EW -> in  an EW

Section 9
- Line 383: formuation -> formulation
- Table 4: CL limits for one -> CL intervals for each
- Figure 5
    - remove timestamp at the bottom left of the figure. 
    - contour -> contours

Section 10
- Figure 6: exclusion -> upper