Physics
156: Wouldn't how the cone size varies be beneficial if mentioned here
174 - 176: iiuc, you ignore jets that are close to leptons but don't reject the event. it's unclear whether you correct MET with them. shouldn't you?
201 - 206: Why should the leading lepton charge matter here... the choice of jet pt is also unexplained. Why sixth and eighth? Highest jet mass/pT why... looking at the input vars plot in the ANs, do you really assign 0 pT when the sixth jet doesn't exist? Does this not introduce a fake sensitivity i.e. a convoluted form of passing another Njet proxy
239: why kind of bias would you get if you don't redefine the pT like this?
Table 2: There's enough space to add a column for the correlations instead of the crosses, no?
426: How can you assume only one particle at a time and mA = mH, and then quote hMSSM when the latter predicts exactly not those assumptions... with this in mind in fig 7 only the "both" scenario are meaningful, and even there at low mass it has problems with mA = mH assumption