Questions:
- L52: Isn't the MADGRAPH5_AMC@NLO a NLO generator?
- L183: They cut on equal online and offline HT. Are there no turn-on effects?
- L197: Why is the CRW not used for the BDT analysis?

Type A:
#Abstract:
- Either give numbers for the cut-based method or write that the BDT is better.
# Section 1:
- L19: top can also decay into d and s quarks
- L20: W bosons can have b decay products
- L21: Jets can also come from tau
# Section 2:
- L52: LO = leading order
- L64: Please describe alpha
- L71: I don't get the argument with the narrow-width approximation. Also, maybe put a reference.
- Section 2: Are there no more corrections? e.g. Pileup reweighting?
# Section 6:
- The section has also minor descriptions of statistic uncertainties and theoretical uncertainties, maybe a better heading is just 'Uncertainties'
- L274-276: There are corrections, they should go in section 2
- L280/284/285: this was mentioned in section 2 already
- L320: You use the fact that the uncertainties are small as a reason for treating these as uncorrelated? Is this justified?
# Section 7:
- L341: What about statistic uncertainties?
# Section 8:
- L369: Write EFT instead of BSM, like in the reference, abstract and summary when refering to \hut{H} 
- Figure 4: The predicted standard model cross section has only one value for the cross section and only one value for y_t which is y_t = y_t^SM right? 

Type B:
#Title: 
 -write center-of-mass energy of 13 TeV.
  In the CMS Guidlines for Authors they write: 'Do not use undefined symbols like \ptmiss but rather write out "missing transverse momentum"'
  If you want to write sqrt(s) in the title, you can define sqrt(s) in line 3 of the Abstract
# Section 4:
- L148: missing comma: write '... both, electrons and muons, ...' otherwise it has a different meaning
# Section 5:
- L230: missing comma: write '... for both, electrons and muons
- L232/233: not consistent 'loose lepton selection ... tight selection ...' eighter leave out lepton in the first case or put in in the second
- L244: unnecessary phrase'rather than added'
# section 7:
- L344/346: better write 'scaled by a factor of 1.1 ...'
- L344-348: absolute factors and factors in %. this is not consistent
# Section 8:
- L388: in L387 you write 'central, upper, and lower values' therefore write '< 1.7, 1.4, and 2.0, respectively'