Simulation and Analysis TF

Europe/Berlin
Description
Task force on simulation and analysis activities Topic: LUXE simulation Meeting ID: 265 178 9663 Password: 946342 Time: Aug 18, 2020 10:00 AM Jerusalem Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://weizmann.zoom.us/j/2651789663?pwd=NWpaMzlLclpmdmtERFpYMS9DQ2gzdz09 Or Telephone: Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): US: +1 470 250 9358 or +1 206 337 9723 United Kingdom: +44 203 481 5237 or +44 131 460 1196 Israel: +972 3 978 6688 Meeting ID: 265 178 9663 Password: 946342 International numbers available: https://weizmann.zoom.us/u/aM3jhiGHP Or an H.323/SIP room system: H.323: 162.255.37.11 (US West) 162.255.36.11 (US East) 115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai) 115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad) 213.19.144.110 (EMEA) 103.122.166.55 (Australia) 64.211.144.160 (Brazil) 69.174.57.160 (Canada) 207.226.132.110 (Japan) Meeting ID: 265 178 9663 Password: 946342 SIP: 2651789663@zoomcrc.com Password: 946342 Or Skype for Business (Lync): https://weizmann.zoom.us/skype/2651789663

Tony:

- started with JETI40 at nominal 16.5 GeV

- should we quote the peak or average \xi? —> can translate peak to average 

- what’s the size?

- what’s the multiplicity? probably need to keep the rule o thumb that we have in total ~100k tracks

- need the Brems spectrum from Sasha (high priority)

 

Sasha:

- status of jobs?

  - 1 billion produced already

  - agree to go up to 10^10 with this production and then stop to check integrity.

  - then update the model (missing supports for all systems, longer fwd spectrometer (30 cm), target material at the end of the beampipe, windows material before the IP detectors, flex cables of the staves, angles of Cherenkovs and LYSOs, profiler location and material, calo crate, proper B-field map, etc.)

- small inconsistencies found for the IP chamber but not dramatic —> fixed

- fwd spectrometer:

  - why do we put the Cherenkovs with an angle?

  - LYSO should be longer —> ~30 cm

- still room to play with the G4 exact configuration of how G4 simulates the interaction within the large passive materials (shielding etc).

- include the beam halo in the simulation.

- output isn’t big

- check with Louis the size and weight of the shielding since it is both expensive and too heavy

 

Kyle:

- need to estimate the dose (1Gy limitation)

  - estimate as ~1e-3 Gy so big problem? to be checked quickly

  - here it will be important to minimise the thickness of the target to reduce the rates

- what’s the distance between the detectors and the shielding?

- keep discussing with Maryna and Sasha to make sure everything is coherent (geometry, materials, etc.).

- check what is the source of the large dose (can check in FLUKA the directions)

- profiler downstream the fwd spectrometer:

  - important for angular distributions.

  - will be some sort of a scintillating screen 

  - probably after the shielding?

 

Louis:

- possible to get the B-field maps in the next ~month by DESY people

- check if there’s simulation so we can do extrapolations later

- what we need:

  - B-field maps for 1, 1.6 and 2 T (what granularity?)

  - stability of current (and hence B-field)

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.
    • 1
      Intro
      Speakers: Dr Anthony Hartin (DESY), Dr Gianluca Sarri (Queen's University Belfast), Dr Noam Tal Hod (Weizmann Institute of Science)
    • 2
      Signal simulation status
      Speaker: Dr Anthony Hartin (DESY)
      Slides
    • 3
      GEANT4 simulation status
      Speaker: Oleksandr Borysov (DESY)
      Slides
    • 4
      Fwd spectrometer update
      Speaker: Mr Kyle Fleck (QUB)
      Slides
    • 5
      Planning for simulation chapter
      Speaker: Matthew Wing (UCL)
      Slides
    • 6
      CDR: Detectors
      Speakers: Dr Gianluca Sarri (Queen's University Belfast), Prof. Halina Abramowicz (Tel Aviv University), Mr John Hallford (UCL), Dr Maryna Borysova (KINR), Matthew Wing (UCL), Dr Noam Tal Hod (Weizmann Institute of Science), Prof. Wolfgang Lohmann (DESY)