Questions to EB2  plus Decisions                    24.8.21
================================                    =======

All figures were modified according to the decisions of EB1

  -- Are there any further issues?

 == ratio plots on PDFs
 
   -- Figures 7/8/9/10 stay
   -- ZZ: new plot:
          -- total uncertainties and ratios of all 4 PDFs
            -- we looked at a first version of this  at 10 GeV^2:
               == no extra information obtained
	       ==> 
		    --> internal material for 10GeV^2
		        style of Fig.4  for  NNLO and JetsNNLO
		        ratio plot with total uncertainties  

The text [content] was modified according to the decisions of EB1.

 == Are there any further issues as far as content is concerned?
  
  -- SS:line 305-311: I have great difficulties to understand that text.
     My proposal would be to remove this, or to say something more
     simple. Maybe like this:
     ... questionable.
     For jet cross section predictions, a variation of alpha_s is
     similar to a scale variation, and HERAPDF2.0Jets is made available
     for two different choices of fixed alpha_s.
     Nevertheless, a cross check ...

   ==> EB2 Decision: Keep it in and Iris and Thomas work on it

  -- comparison with past results; lines 278 -- 291
     the red stuff goes.
     Should the rest stay or just be replaced with their is broad
     agreement with rpevious results?

   ==> EB2 Decision: keep as it as far as numbers are concerns
                     and add sentences on consistency.
                     Include NNLOJet result from their erratum.
      
  -- MS: no lines between 34 and 35

   ==> EB2 decison: Keep paragraph -- rephrase to make it clearer
                                   -- discuss with AMCS, KK & MS  

  -- TG: line 47
         It is only a standard assumption
   ==> EB2 decision:	 
	 l.46 In addition -->  even if this assumption is valid. == out 
         new text: In addition --directly--> might be biased ...
    
  -- BF: line 40
         explicite inclusions of heavy quark data sets 
         line 78 to 82
	 sounds like we excluded data -- has to be avoided.

I suggest to send additional textual comments on the blue text within
7 days after the EB.

Plan:
The text has changed considerably. Thus, the edior will go through
the textual comments and check what is still relevant and decide
what to implement and what to dicuss at the reading.
Individual Emails have been/will be sent.

========================================================================