Discussion following Nicola’s presentation

Andreas: Question on storage of MeerKLASS data
Joe: Only prototyping on PUNCH resources - it is not intended to hold the MeerKLASS data on PUNCH resources. 

Harry: How about the output of the project - what happens to the data? 
Joe: As long as small data sets for prototyping, there is no problem with making the output data public. Later, there might be an embargo period for the entire data during which they would be proprietary. 

Harry: Question on the flow chart shown by Nicola
Nicola: C4P can do the imaging part as is, but not the OTF correction without modification that this use case wants to trigger. 

Achim: Project presented as an ideal goal; practical goals focus on the tools. How, in the near term, can this be integrated into the SDP? 
Nicola: Good topic for discussion. There are pilot observations available - add small amounts of data whose reduction could be ask to the portal and that could then be retrieved through the portal. 

Achim: Timescale for this project? 
Nicola: short! Needs closer interaction with interested TAs. In terms of portal - work on that can start!

Thomas K: what is the higher-level view - what will be the research product in the end, and is this an analysis that can be better with our development / tools and was more cumbersome before? 
Nicola: Combination: File product are images and source catalogues that can be used later. Parts of the data reduction pipelines were done manually on small data sets - now make it automatic and large-scale (manual does not even work for pilot observation). C4P, S4P offer ideal framework for this automation. 

Matthias: With TA2 hat - this is at the limit of C4P possibilities! If only one location and one computer to perform the job - what is the use of C4P? 
Joe: this is a generic, relatively data-heavy use case. If we can do this, we can do 60% of all astro use cases. 

Matthias: Can some of the necessary work be done by the Stimela developers, or do we adjust our infrastructure for every pipeline job? 

Christoph: Can the places where the data are today not become part of S4P? 
Joe: exactly - this should happen in the future - we need to include targeted platforms. 
==> would require all these platforms etc. to agree to our / be compatible with our infrastructure (AAI etc.)

Next steps - see also Nicola’s last slide)

- Closer collaboration on C4P and S4P with TA2 —> current contact points to Manuel and Christoph
	==> Manuel: Move discussion to official C4P and S4P discussion channels (Mattermost)
	==> Nicola to create dedicated channel and invite the relevant people
	==> TA2 people to take the discussion to the relevant C4P and S4P meetings

- Nicola needs help on REANA —> Harry: also take discussion to the new dedicated channel
	==> Nicola to register for REANA with the help of Harry; next steps to be discussed between the two. 

- Next meetings:
	==> 19 July: Olaf’s heavy flavour use case
	==> 2 August: focus again on Nicola’s use case