Speaker
Description
Abstract. A significant amount of cryogenic permanent magnet undulators (CPMUs) were deployed in the past at the ESRF with significantly more overall emitted spectral power and reduced gaps [1, 2]. Further insertion device (ID) upgrade plans exist with double (2x2m) CPMU arrangements and possible high-temperature superconducting IDs.
The drastically increased emission of photons and linked thermal power leads to higher thermal stresses on heat load absorbing elements in the front end. This poses challenges related to low-cycle fatigue (LCF) which is characterized by thermo-mechanical stress cycling that exceed the material yield point and occurring plastic strain [3]. Linked to the drastically reduced emittance of the new forth generation ESRF-EBS machine, new front end beam sizing components were introduced with reduced exit aperture to cut unwanted spectral energies. These were not properly validated in terms of lifetime in the run for the EBS upgrade. A review was conducted to estimate the lifespan of these new components alongside the existing 30-year-old standard front end absorbers, considering powerful current and future ID upgrades.
Alternative designs based on the copper alloy CuCr1Zr are proposed for the components that failed this review. CuCr1Zr links high thermal conductivity of copper with increased strength and hardness. Many recent ESRF-EBS heat load absorbers are almost exclusively based this material and its advantageous properties [4]. ESRF specifications for CuCr1Zr were carefully developed in the past to guarantee a minimum hardness. This enables the possibility to easily machine UHV compatible components in bulk material that include Conflat flanges with purely classic machining procedures (milling, turning, EDM-wire cutting). Complicated brazing of flanges with materials such as GlidCop-Al15 or Cu-OFHC is therefore not necessary. Few data exists about the LCF behavior of CuCr1Zr. We launched LCF tests for material produced according to the ESRF specs to obtain strain-lifetime data for reliable component lifetime prediction.
REFERENCES
[1] J. Chavanne, G. Le Bec, and C. Penel, Synchrotron Radiation News 24, 10–13 (2011).
[2] P. Falaise, P. Raimondi, C. Benabderrahmane, R. Versteegen, G. LeBec, S. Lagarde, S. White, B. Ogier, J. Chavanne, and S. Liuzzo, Proceedings of the 14th Int. Particle Accelerator Conf. IPAC2023, 3177–3180 (2023).
[3] S. Takahashi, M. Sano, T. Mochizuki, A. Watanabe, and H. Kitamura, Journal of Synchrotron Radiation 15, 144–150 (2008).
[4] F. Thomas, J.-C. Biasci, D. Coulon, Y. Dabin, T. Ducoing, F. Ewald, E. Gagliardini, and P. Marion, Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Design of Synchrotron Radiation Equipment and Instrumentation MEDSI2016, 257–261 (2016).
| I plan to submit also conference proceedings | Yes |
|---|
