ATTENTION! We have to do a short maintenance with downtime on Wed 8 Oct 2025, 09:00 - 10:00 CEST . Please finish your work in time to prevent data loss.
For further information, please have look at the IT-News article

26 August 2024 to 2 September 2024
Europe/Berlin timezone

Survey

DESY Summer Student Programme evaluation 2024

DESY Summer student survey 2024

The two questions on name and group are optional. Please do not fill these out if you want to remain anonymous; however, it would help us if you could at least indicate your to which Program Part your project belongs..

Important:

- Please take note of the general rating scheme: 1=bad, 2=rather poor, 3=medium, 4=good 5=excellent

*

1=bad, 5=excellent

*

1=bad, 5=excellent

*

1=bad, 5=excellent

Please let us know how you rate the administrative procedures, communication, salary, travel reimbursement, infrastructure in your local group, etc.

*

1=bad, 5=excellent

*

We would like to hear about:
- How interesting did you find your project?
- How much have you learnt/gained from it?
- Was the project well defined, prepared and supervised?
- Technical quality of infrastructure and communication
- Ideas and suggestions for improvements

*
  • What did you like in general and what not?
  • Was the amount, length and difficulty level of the lectures ok?
  • Do you have improvement suggestions for the selection of lecture topics (e.g. topics that are missing or topics that should get less coverage), the programme structure and session style?

You can give feedback to individual lectures at the end of the questionnaire.

Regarding the amount of time spend on the lectures and the project work, what do you think about the ideal distribution

*

1=bad, 5=excellent

From 1=bad to 5=excellent.

Please comment on the quality of the housing, the rooms, equipment, administration, procedures, etc. and let us know what could be improved

1=bad, 2=rather poor, 3=medium, 4=good 5=excellent

1=bad, 2=rather poor, 3=medium, 4=good 5=excellent

1=bad, 2=rather poor, 3=medium, 4=good 5=excellent
e.g. Detector Assembly Facility, PETRA beamlines, Computing Center

The organisation of the smaller guided tours was a new part of this year's programme. Therefore we would really appreciate feedback, general one (was it worthwhile) as well as regarding the organisation, comments on tours as well as suggestions for additional ones.

Do you have any comments or suggestions to the Hamburg area e.g. places we should suggest future summies to visit?

e.g. as a PhD student/PostDoc... (not only as a visitor)

Detailed lecture feedback

Here you can give feedback on single lectures (voluntarily, you do not need to comment on every single one).