- Indico style
- Indico style - inline minutes
- Indico style - numbered
- Indico style - numbered + minutes
- Indico Weeks View
Topic: LUXE simulation and analysis TF
Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
Password: 434044
Time: This is a recurring meeting Meet anytime
Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://weizmann.zoom.us/j/91670257822?pwd=L01uZHJMTmtmNkdpUklOTnlMU1M5QT09
Or Telephone:
Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location):
US: +1 206 337 9723 or +1 470 250 9358
United Kingdom: +44 131 460 1196 or +44 203 481 5237
Israel: +972 3 978 6688
Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
Password: 434044
International numbers available: https://weizmann.zoom.us/u/aQxpHqFgj
Or an H.323/SIP room system:
H.323:
162.255.37.11 (US West)
162.255.36.11 (US East)
115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai)
115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad)
213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
213.244.140.110 (Germany)
103.122.166.55 (Australia)
149.137.40.110 (Singapore)
64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
69.174.57.160 (Canada)
207.226.132.110 (Japan)
Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
Password: 434044
SIP: 91670257822@zoomcrc.com
Password: 434044
Or Skype for Business (Lync):
https://weizmann.zoom.us/skype/91670257822
Sasha:
- new infrastructure is imported
- check integrity of the stave services implementation
- some parts appear as disconnected and some parts are in the air
- need the material composition of the “other” parts (not the stave)
Stuart:
- quadrupoles should be as much as possible close to the IP? (50 cm away from the Brems target??)
- will you be responsible for the design in the experiment?
- do we have the design of the beamline supports?
- beam halo will be the main source of bkg?
- slide 16 - what is the vertical line?
- need root output —> talk with Sasha
- Beate:
- need to see how to optimise the distances of the magnets etc wrt the upstream target.
- do not need tight focus at the target —> need a range X um at the target (i.e. for the ICS IP - 10 um??) and Y um at the main IP (about 9 um now without optimisation)?
- we do not know what is the impact on the physics from larger beam size.
- Louis:
- could move the target ~1.5 m upstream
- measurement of the beam halo profile is ongoing
- Sasha:
- G4 will simulate the gas+electron interaction (with cross section biasing or event generator?).
- 7M primaries with 200 nodes on the cluster took a couple of hours.
- do we take into account time correlation (in time / faster / slower than the main beam) —> should be in time
Louis:
- the ~50 mm height of the volume is due to what? —> set with larger y-axis is taking more power (B-field volume)
- how many magnets of the blue one do we have? —> no but we can buy
- maybe we should change the magnets in the model ~now —> wait for Louis to confirm shortly.
- cannot be a permanent magnet
- Louis will ask for quotes.
Arka:
-
Daniel:
- the strong focusing is causing more angular spread so less focusing means narrower bandwidth for the output Compton photons energy. However, with less focused beam we get a factor of ~3 less Compton photons.
- Shan:
- try to produce the x:z vertex plots from the Tracks tree for each face of the calo alone
- try to confirm if the additional bkg is coming