Simulation and Analysis TF

→ Europe/Berlin
Description

Topic: LUXE simulation and analysis TF
Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
Password: 434044
Time: This is a recurring meeting Meet anytime

Join from PC, Mac, Linux, iOS or Android: https://weizmann.zoom.us/j/91670257822?pwd=L01uZHJMTmtmNkdpUklOTnlMU1M5QT09


Or Telephone:
    Dial(for higher quality, dial a number based on your current location): 
        US: +1 206 337 9723  or +1 470 250 9358 
        United Kingdom: +44 131 460 1196  or +44 203 481 5237 
        Israel: +972 3 978 6688 
    Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
    Password: 434044
    International numbers available: https://weizmann.zoom.us/u/aQxpHqFgj

Or an H.323/SIP room system:
    H.323: 
        162.255.37.11 (US West)
        162.255.36.11 (US East)
        115.114.131.7 (India Mumbai)
        115.114.115.7 (India Hyderabad)
        213.19.144.110 (Amsterdam Netherlands)
        213.244.140.110 (Germany)
        103.122.166.55 (Australia)
        149.137.40.110 (Singapore)
        64.211.144.160 (Brazil)
        69.174.57.160 (Canada)
        207.226.132.110 (Japan)
    Meeting ID: 916 7025 7822
    Password: 434044

    SIP: 91670257822@zoomcrc.com
    Password: 434044

Or Skype for Business (Lync):
    https://weizmann.zoom.us/skype/91670257822

Hide

mc sim:
- check if Sasha can submit in the grid
- follow up offline on the distribution to sites

Daniel:
- need to resolve the ellipse shape (at ~10m it would be ~300 um)
- Gianluca:
  - we should mostly quantify xi with the profiler (i.e. intensity at the IP)
  - “collision quality” monitoring 
  - the profiler will be sensitive to the number of photons more than the power (i.e. cannot infer the energy from the deposition)
  - photon spectrometer should be able to measure double differential (dN/(dE*dTheta))

Ben:
- s2 - head-on can be in the ICS case, no? (what’s the impact of our angle?)
- s3: what do we actually measure form the ellipse? average xi or max xi or peak xi? —> would need to see how things come out of Tom’s simulation and how these are seen in the profiler
- LCFA will have around 10% uncertainty at xi =~2-3
- s5: do we have a cutoff to the energy deposition in the profiler? —> the energy deposited can be very small - what’s the scale of the low-E tail in the plots?
- LMA is slow to simulate
- Gianluca:
  - xi<1 can be done with a simple model (dipole etc…)? —> we can use the profiler there. In principle we can do perturbative calculation there.
- Daniel:
  - what would be the impact of the collision angle? —> TBD
- we have a problem with prediction uncertainty between xi=1 and xi=~2

Tom:
- Gianluca:
  - proposal is good
- need to talk offline with Gianluca, Marco and Sasha to see which points we need to simulated with G4 for the profiler tests.
  - we should also fold in the impact of the converter and the air before the profiler
  - we need to look at the photon 2D distribution before the converter, before the exit of the beampipe and just before the profiler

Gianluca:
- will be used also in the g+laser
- Daniel:
  - if we have the profiler measurement, the photon spectrum and the electron beam divergence, can we estimate the actual xi? --> probably yes but more work is needed
  - what do you actually measure here? (peak xi, average xi, max xi,....)? --> not clear at the moment 

There are minutes attached to this event. Show them.